WootHosting 4GB内存 纽约 OpenVZ VPS测评

详情：WootHosting：$19/年/2GB内存/50GB虚拟主机/2TB流量/OpenVZ/洛杉矶/迈阿密/纽约 所谓的CLOUD RESOURCE POOL，就是一个大母鸡，你可以开多个小鸡，30美元这款可以开4个，可选洛杉矶、纽约、迈阿密Data Center，或者就建1个，配置强，这样看，其实挺不错。 从测试的3款综合看，洛杉矶最好，其次纽约，不建议选择迈阿密。

1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试

CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 2666.704 MHz Total size of Disk : 100.0 GB (0.8 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 4096 MB (16 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 14 min Load average : 0.00, 2.61, 4.34 OS : CentOS 7.2.1511 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab124.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s Average I/O speed : 1228.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 55.0MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 12.0MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.30MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 10.2MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 8.89MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.85MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 40.5MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 3.95MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 9.45MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 6.47MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 6.86MB/s

2、上传/下载带宽测试

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Mimosa Networks (Fremont, CA) [14.34 km]: 88.15 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 186.65 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 96.01 Mbit/s

3、国内访问速度

4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.227576 s, 1.2 GB/s

5、UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 10:01:49 - 10:29:57 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26442235.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3437.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2792.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 594160.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 163285.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1375485.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1267542.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 114646.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5297.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5698.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1920.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1692687.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26442235.1 2265.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3437.0 624.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2792.6 649.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 594160.3 1500.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 163285.7 986.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1375485.5 2371.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1267542.1 1018.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 114646.5 286.6 Process Creation 126.0 5297.9 420.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5698.7 1344.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1920.4 3200.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1692687.4 1128.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1056.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 10:29:57 - 10:58:07 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 104764575.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 13712.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 13645.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 620945.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 171701.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1740323.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 4939539.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 784553.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 23473.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16783.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2392.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4883326.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 104764575.7 8977.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13712.4 2493.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 13645.6 3173.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 620945.4 1568.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 171701.4 1037.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1740323.3 3000.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4939539.8 3970.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 784553.5 1961.4 Process Creation 126.0 23473.6 1863.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16783.7 3958.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2392.4 3987.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4883326.6 3255.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2825.1

6、丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.103.55 to 23.95.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 12/29 00:15:31.558 Ping to 23.95.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 12/29 00:15:31.876 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=316ms TTL=46, ave=316.00ms 12/29 00:15:32.873 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=322ms TTL=46, ave=319.00ms 12/29 00:15:33.845 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=294ms TTL=46, ave=310.67ms 12/29 00:15:34.876 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=324ms TTL=46, ave=314.00ms 12/29 00:15:36.875 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=327ms TTL=46, ave=317.83ms 12/29 00:15:48.845 PingMin #18 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=292ms TTL=46, ave=311.56ms 12/29 00:15:50.870 === 20 有效发送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丢失, 311.85ms 平均值 === --- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------ 开始时间: 2017/12/29 00:15:31 经过时间: 000:00:19 结束时间: 2017/12/29 00:15:50 ---------------- 20 总计发送 0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误) ---------------- 20 有效发送 20 有效接收 0 timed out (0.00% 丢失) Ping 最小值 292ms, 最大值 327ms, 平均值 311.85ms

7、路由追踪 电信

联通

移动

推荐站内搜索：我的ip地址、海外服务器、香港空间哪个好、个人注册域名、vps主机、台湾主机、国外免费云服务器、代理服务器ip、php空间推荐、租用服务器、